|Road marking removal||Line paint removal|
|Asphalt marking removal||Tape removal|
|Concrete marking removal||Epoxy removal|
|Cure compound removal||Thermoplastic material removal|
The most challenging obstacle in a successful stripe or pavement marking removal is efficiently removing the markings from the asphalt or concrete without causing damage to the surface. Oftentimes the lines are nearly as hard – and in some cases harder – than the underlying surface.
A piece of equipment known as a grinder is the traditional way to remove markings. Grinders typically use rotating steel or carbide teeth. To completely remove the stripes, grinders must reach the lowest level of paint penetration, usually about ¼” – ½” below the surface, that will remove the surface and create unsafe ruts.
By contrast, Waterblasting.com’s unique Stripe Hog ™ system can quickly eliminate even the most resilient pavement markings while still protecting the integrity of the surface.
The needle-sharp water jets blasting at 40,000 psi are able to penetrate the porous surface of the road surface and extract the paint or thermo without destroying the surface itself.
The Stripe Hog™ performs at such a high level of efficiency that a single pass of the waterjet is all that’s required to remove any and all undesired markings.
For an in-depth look at our amazingly efficient process, please read the case study below. Read how the Tennessee Department of Transportation wanted to eliminate misplaced markings on a brand new road without damaging the surface. You’ll learn what happened when Waterblasting.com’s Stripe Hog™ came to the rescue.
By Lindsey Arner
Maryland Department of Transportation recently undertook a project to eradicate a series of taped lines from the southbound lanes of busy Interstate-95. Because of the dangerous nature of highway construction, the job required special planning, and needed to be completed at night – preferably, in one night.
We caught up with Paul Dubois, Waterblasting.com System Operator to discuss the recent Maryland DOT contract. Upon his arrival to the jobsite, Paul learned that he and the SH8000R he was driving were not the only ones contracted to remove the tape on the roadway. “They had another company doing the same thing with a grinder,” he shares. Preston Ginyard was also on I-95 that night, working for Maryland DOT onsite. Ginyard was in charge of the operation.
He offered us a firsthand account of how the job went, and explains that Paul’s role was initially an experimental one. “We did it more as a trial,” Ginyard says. He went on to tell us the men with the grinders would have been there with or without Paul. “Roadway Safety would have been there regardless because we had to get it done in one night.”
Mr. Ginyard was fully aware of the problems he faced with the grinding equipment. “They’re a mess.
And a waste of time,” Preston said. But, with a pressing overnight deadline, the expert didn’t have much
of a choice but to use them. Or at least he didn’t think so. But Paul Dubois knew otherwise. He humbly accepted his portion of the roadway marking removal project, and got to work with the SH8000R. Immediately, Mr. Ginyard noticed something different about Dubois’ operation.
“I’ve been in asphalt all my life,” Ginyard began. “I’ve never seen it done that way before. He did it so fast – 1-man operation, self-contained. It was just…amazing.” And “fast” was no exaggeration. Preston’s Roadway Safety team was removing about 700 feet of tape per hour; Dubois and the SH8000R were operating at approximately 3500 feet an hour, and sometimes higher.
“Soon, they were falling behind,” Paul says about the inevitably slower pace of the grinder’s capabilities. Shortly thereafter, a very impressed Mr. Ginyard put Paul to work on the other parts of the highway,and had him take over the grinder’s portion. He was amazed at the SH8000R’s production quality, and time efficiency. “He made it easy!” praises Ginyard. Mr. Ginyard went on to compare just how literal of a difference Paul and the SH8000R made. “Grinders take out 1/8” to 2/8” of an inch of asphalt,” he explains. “You can’t have that in winter.” If water gets trapped in the ruts, it ultimately freezes, causing hazardous icy roadways. So aside from operating five times faster than the grinding equipment, the SH8000R left absolutely no damage, and was largely responsible for the project’s success.
Before ending on the high note, and breaking for breakfast, Preston and his crew offered up high-fives to Paul, a reported fist pump or two was spotted, and some were even snapping photos. As for Paul’s trial run, let’s just say he earned his stripes. “Oh, I write the reports,” says Preston. “He’ll definitely get my recommendation.” And of the SH8000R and its remarkable technology, Preston sums it up best, saying it’s “The way to make things last.”
Tennessee Department of Transportation Case Study – HTML
Tennessee Department of Transportation Case Study – (8 MB PDF file)